Casual research of Elizabeth Sparhawk-Jones is a nightmare. The references for her date of birth range from 1874 to 1885. Her death, anywhere from 1951 (13 years prior to the Smithsonian interview), to 1968. By all claims, the precocious Sparhawk-Jones entered the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts aged 15, yet the accepted dates of her enrollment at the Academy place her at 16 or, more likely, 17, upon entrance. A single, more prominent piece of hers lists creation dates anywhere from 1910 to 1930, making it extremely difficult to track her artistic growth during her career. The National Museum of Women in the Arts cannot even provide her place of birth, nor where she studied or resided. It almost seems that the facts of the artist's life were intentionally obfuscated.

How could this be? How could an artist, whose work realized prices equivalent to $50,000 today, and who received accolades proclaiming her to be a better artist than even her teacher, the famous William Merritt Chase, nearly disappear so completely?
Sadly, it may just be that Sparhawk-Jones refused to hide herself away after recovering from a nervous breakdown, so the world hid the record of her instead. In a time when all forms of mental illness were considered insanity, Elizabeth found herself suffering from a debilitating depression, which, even after temporarily conquering it, left her stigmatized by a world still in its infancy in the understanding of mental health. For polite society, if troubled people were not locked away in an asylum, it was probably best just to ignore them lest their taint spread. Was this the fate Elizabeth suffered?
After a meteoric rise in the arts, it seems that Elizabeth just disappeared. She took a sabbatical from painting to recuperate from her depression, and upon her return, while under influence from PAFA friends Morton Schamberg and Charles Sheeler, changed her painting focus to the Modernist movements coming out of France. Though she participated in several important Modern Art shows in America, she never really attained the same standing in the Modern Art world that she had enjoyed as the teen-aged Impressionist figural painter.
Elizabeth Sparhawk-Jones may be forgotten, but she is not gone, or at least this is the feeling of author Barbara Lehman Smith. In a serendipitous event, three boxes containing long-lost papers belonging to Sparhawk-Jones were spared from the incinerator, and mistakingly delivered to Smith's public relations office at the hospital where she worked. Smith's previous office on the grounds of the hospital was in the old Trimbush House, once owned by Elizabeth's sister, Margaret Turnbull, and when Trimbush was scheduled for demolition, the three boxes were removed from the attic, and inadvertently mixed in with Smith's belongings. Feeling the unseen hand of Elizabeth Sparhawk-Jones urging her to tell the tale, Smith began on a ten-year journey researching and writing about this elusive artist.
To learn more about Barbara Lehman Smith's book, Elizabeth Sparhawk Jones: The Artist Who Lived Twice, visit Smith's website and join the mailing list to be notified of the book's future publication.


13 comments:
What an amazing story and what beautiful work! I've already joined the mailing list.
Fascinating! Thanks for providing information and images for this wonderful painter.
Kate Freeman Clark, another artist of her time and who also studied with Chase, sadly was mostl forgotten as well. It's good to see that the public is starting to understand the value of these pioneers in our history and shed some light on their accomplishments.
She looks like a wonderful painter, I hope we see more of her in the future.
Thanks!
She is one of my favorite artists...thanks, I would love to know more about her and her work.
A lot of mentally ill artists have remained famous. She's probably obscure because she's a chick. Ever noticed how many female artists who are sucsessful in life become obscure in death? Rosa Bonheur, Artemisia Gentileschi... although, a lot of male artists become obscure in death also.
L.-
Wow, your question actually opens up many more...
Of course the arts have suffered from the same prejudices that plague most fields. It's no coincidence that white, educated males from a wealthy background have had the most success- they had the most opportunities available to them.
Can you think of any African Americans having successful careers at the turn of the previous century? I can only think of one off the top of my head. Caucasian, female artists had an easier time than did minorities; I can think of several female artists from the same time period.
Artemisia really can't be compared to female artists of the 20th century. In her time, art was a considered a laborers job; women were just not really not accepted in the arts then. She had quite a bit more to overcome.
In the 20th century, women had many more opportunities, and because of Women's Rights movements, then and in the present, the legacy of many female artists has been preserved.
There are probably more male artists that have been expunged from art history than female artists, but then, there have been more male artists than female artists. The percentages are impossible to figure.
Was Rosa Bonheur forgotten? That seems hard to believe considering the overall impact her entire family had on the arts. Perhaps the art world treats animal artists differently from landscape artists, and both those genres differently from figurative and portrait painters. How many animal artists from the past can you name? With Rosa, you also have the question of sexuality, and did rumors of lesbianism affect her reputation in art circles.
It's really such a complex comparison.
Maybe it is best to compare Sparhawk-Jones to Cecilia Beaux. The two Americans both trained in Philadelphia and had connections to France. Their careers overlapped. Many felt that Sparhawk-Jones had better skill in brush handling, making her the better painter, but how much better known is Beaux?
The sad truth may be that Sparhawk-Jones lived through her mental difficulties. Artists who spiraled downward and were ultimately destroyed by their illnesses were easier to forgive, and easier to romanticize. Someone who stuck around after suffering had to be acknowledged, and that was harder to do.
It's all so fascinating, and just leads to so much more to think about...
Best-
M.
I just wanted to share a letter I received from Barbara Smith, author of Elizabeth Sparhawk-Jones: The Artist Who Lived Twice:
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for the link to my book's web site, Elizabeth Sparhawk-Jones: The Artist Who Lived Twice. A few of the names in this week's mailing list additions mentioned your blog, underpaintings, so I checked it out and read your blog of July 13 about ESJ. My favorite sentence is that "casual research is a nightmare, " that's perfect....so you can imagine how it was for me 10 years ago when I started out on my search for who she was (and I'm a journalist not an artist). My clues ranged from Edwin Arlington Robinson to F. Scott Fitzgerarld to Marsden Hartley, a pretty diverse field as you see....By the way, I think you answered that comment about why she wasn't "more famous" very accurately. The only thing I'd add is that when I interviewed her family, none believed she was very much into the pr or promotions of her work, she'd much rather have Rehn Gallieries or the Graham brothers do their thing so she could just paint. --- Not to say she didn't care about reviews of her exhibitions (but she saved the bad clippings as well.)
Anyway your wonderful analysis sending a flurry of names to my mailing list came at an opportune time for me as I've just begun the book query process; last week an agent wrote to me that it "breaks his heart" that while he feels ESJ is very worthy of a biography, he doesn't feel that a "contemporary" audience would find her story appealing. So you've given me a shot of optimisim as I continue the work of getting the book published.
For those you referred, I do send a confirmation when someone joins the mailing list and will get those out this week too. Anyway, thanks again for the link and for keeping ESJ's story alive another day.
All my best,
Barbara Lehman Smith
Another great post! I am such a fan of this blog, it seems as if I am always learning something new. Fascinating,sad story of a talaented artist.
Sad how Women in Art is forgotten easier. They say that of all contemporary Artists Cindy Sherman is the only female artists that will be remembered. It makes me all frustrated...hope I can one day do something about it!!
Sitting steps away from The Art Institute of Chicago's painting by Sparhawk-Jones--I had NO idea of her story. I've bought the book, so will. Her early work was a delicious concoction that was swamped by her time's prejudice toward mental illness. How sad.
I just want to emphasize that the first painting that you show of her work is on permanent display at the Chicago Art Institute in the American Section after 1900. It's stunning and one of my most favorite paintings in the museum. I encourage all of us to tell the publisher of her new biography that it will sell well if they include high quality photos of her paintings!
Post a Comment